215 Comments
User's avatar
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Mar 12
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
SW's avatar

try to keep up

Expand full comment
ArcticStones's avatar

Right now, Andy Borowitz has a fascinating live interview with Paul Krugman. Not paywalled.

https://substack.com/@borowitzreport?liveStream=14962

As many may remember, Krugman left the New York Times over their increasingly intrusive editing (and outright cancellation of his column); Borowitz left the New Yorker after many years.

What do Borowitz, Krugman, Jennifer Rubin, and our own Simon Rosenberg have in common? They use their Substack platforms to effectively communicate directly with their readers and listeners!

Expand full comment
SW's avatar

Thanks so much, Arctic, for this link!!

Expand full comment
Lisa Iannucci's avatar

Just watched - SO good.

Expand full comment
ArcticStones's avatar

A headline I would like to see:

. "Trump accidentally self-deports using new feature in Homeland Security app"

https://www.axios.com/2025/03/11/dhs-new-app-self-deport-feature-immigrants

Expand full comment
Susan Dieterlen's avatar

From your keyboard to God's ears!

Expand full comment
Cindy H's avatar

Thanks! I copied the link to view it later. Much appreciated.

Expand full comment
ArcticStones's avatar

“If you wonder what you would have done in Nazi Germany in the 1930s, you are doing it now.”

Expand full comment
Geene Rees's avatar

You may want to follow Rep. Tom Mc Clintock and the Yosemite layoffs too.

Expand full comment
Claudia Miller's avatar

He needs to post on Bluesky so we can amplify him. Hi website will not allow me to sign up for his newsletter. :-(

Expand full comment
Robert Eisenstat's avatar

We need a leader like Adam Smith to represent the Democratic Party- let’s have the presidential convention now!!!

Expand full comment
Sheila's avatar

That's why I wish we had a different system, a parliamentary one with multiple parties. They can call for "snap" elections to be held in TWO weeks! I'm no political pundit but a casual reader of the news and it appears to me that that kind of political system is much more responsive to changing circumstances and more truly representative of an electorate. 300 million Americans and we're encouraged to be either one "major" party or the other? Not workable. More Americans are registered as neither (a/k/a Independent) than Repug or Dem. Our system is a moribund and ossified, stuck in a rut protector of the status quo.

Expand full comment
Jon Sutton's avatar

A big thank you to you and the Hopium community for your support for Susan Crawford and her Wisconsin Supreme Court race. As an active member of the Crawford County Democratic Party in Wisconsin's 3rd CD, I and my colleagues are committed to doing what we can to elect Susan. Your support truly matters!

Expand full comment
Madam Geoffrin's avatar

Been writing postcards but it feels like a vacuum. What’s the buzz?

Expand full comment
Victor Thuronyi's avatar

Many voters still don't know about Crawford and what is at stake. There are negative ads about Crawford on TV. In 2023, the turnout for the S Ct race was about 55% of presidential year turnout. It all depends on turnout.

Expand full comment
Diane Romino's avatar

Let’s turn voters out. 😁

Expand full comment
WA's avatar

The debate is Wednesday at 7:00. Let’s get the word out

Expand full comment
ArcticStones's avatar

Do you have more information on this? Broadcast where? A link?

Expand full comment
Freda's avatar

From WA, in case you missed it -

Wednesday's 7 p.m. debate is hosted by “WISN-TV at Marquette Law School and moderated by 'UPFRONT' hosts Matt Smith and Gerron Jordan. The debate airs statewide and will livestream on WISN's app, Facebook and YouTube pages.”

https://www.wisn.com/article/upfront-recap-crawford-schimel-prepare-for-face-off-in-first-and-only-debate-on-wisn-12/64091952

Expand full comment
ArcticStones's avatar

Many thanks!

Expand full comment
WA's avatar

My Wisconsin calls are in for “round one” today and postcards written for Judge Crawford. Crawford debate is tomorrow night @7PM central time.

I’m really thankful for this community. I feel tired, sad, angry…and then get here and feel empowered again. Thank you Simon!

Expand full comment
Jon Sutton's avatar

One poll had Susan up 42-35, and another has them tied at 47. Not seeing a lot of Shimel yard signs in town, but not a lot of Crawford signs either.

Expand full comment
WA's avatar

Wednesday's 7 p.m. debate is hosted by “WISN-TV at Marquette Law School and moderated by 'UPFRONT' hosts Matt Smith and Gerron Jordan. The debate airs statewide and will livestream on WISN's app, Facebook and YouTube pages.”

https://www.wisn.com/article/upfront-recap-crawford-schimel-prepare-for-face-off-in-first-and-only-debate-on-wisn-12/64091952

Expand full comment
Susan D's avatar

I saw postings about the Wisconsin debate on BlueSky. Can Hopium members spread the word on Facebook? Or other social media?

Expand full comment
Irene's avatar

Je suis Wisconsin 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸!!!!!!

🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻

Expand full comment
Karen Meneghin's avatar

I’m convinced Trump is destabilizing and decimating our beloved country in preparation for “occupation.” I’m also convinced he is not acting alone. The deportations, the muzzling of free speech and press, conformist ideologies enforced by shrill penalties to our institutions must stop before it’s too late. I wake everyday to a nightmare scenario where his staunchest supporters see no wrongdoing.

We need to get louder still.

Expand full comment
Lisa Iannucci's avatar

That is 100% what he is doing. I would bet if I were a betting person that the tariffs idea is coming from his evil benefactor Vlad. Why? BC he can't stop talking about Russia. Whatever he talks about is either what he's doing or planning, or it's projection.

Expand full comment
kitkatmia's avatar

i think everything he does comes from moscow. everything has weakened america, hurt american people, made us isolated, ruined our economy, got rid of most national security experts, decimated our govt expertise. if you wanted to ruin american w/o firing a shot, eliminating generals in the military, wouldnt this be the playbook?

Expand full comment
Karen Meneghin's avatar

And alienating our allies! I mean who could have fault with Canada other than hockey fans!

Expand full comment
ArcticStones's avatar

"I don’t mind sore losers. It’s the winners I mind."

– Woody Allen

Expand full comment
Diane Matza's avatar

What do we do about John Fetterman, who is planning to vote yes on the continuing resolution? I don't know anyone in Pennsylvania, who can call to complain.

Expand full comment
Diane Romino's avatar

Call Fetterman’s office Philadelphia 215-241-1090 or DC Ofc 202-224-4254

Thanks for the heads up

Senate.gov lists all 100 of them

Expand full comment
Kay's avatar

Listen to what Simon says about the problem before the Senate if the CR gets past the House. There is no easy solution. Vote no and shut down the government-Bad. Vote yes and the government is a shitshow that Republicans own-Bad. Who wants either? So I will wait til Simon gives some clear indication about how I can best speak to the moment before calling on that issue.

Expand full comment
Thomas's avatar

"Vote yes and the government is a shitshow..."

Vote yes and you've just strengthened Trump's and Musk's hands. The real ringmasters of the shitshow.

Suddenly a shut-down doesn't look so bad. .. "But I'm afraid.... afraid!" ...

So, let's admit when FEAR is driving us. This government -- which has usurped Congress -- NEEDS to be shut down, if that's how things play out.

"Mr. Schumer, shut down this shit show."

Expand full comment
Kay's avatar

Elon Musk wants a shut down. He wants to be able to continue firing "non-essential" workers that will be identified by the shut down. That gives me pause. Anything that Elon Musk wants gives me pause. That is not fear. That is being strategic.

Expand full comment
Thomas's avatar

“Don't throw me into the briar patch, Br'er Fox!"

If Musk actually wanted a shut down, he'd go to Massa Trump, and Trump would have his cult members shut things down. It would no longer depend on Democrats -- who are being hood-winked.

Expand full comment
Freda's avatar

He will do what he wants regardless as long as T is onboard. So shut the govt down - that kind of strong resistance is the only thing that works with Trump and all bullies. Call their bluffs.

Expand full comment
Freda's avatar

My decision exactly! Thank you

Expand full comment
wendy moluf's avatar

What is the benefit of continuing the funding that Elon and Trump are impounding at will? Voting for this CR is voting to let them continue to make Congress an afterthought. In my opinion, this is a line to draw - no votes for anything without some kind of ironclad guarantee that funds will be spent as appropriated by CONGRESS. This is no longer business or politics as usual, we are fighting fascism.

Expand full comment
JOHN BUCKHOLZ's avatar

The CR that the House is considering would let Elon keep doing his thing until a vote on a permanent budget.

Expand full comment
Freda's avatar

The longest single day in history. But if the Dems stand against Republican trickery and vote a unified NO, they gain strength, possible negotiation, and a lot of publicity for our cause. If they vote YES, they and we risk getting swallowed up. Musk and T will do what they want regardless of whether the CR passes or doesn't pass the Senate.

Expand full comment
Janet HB's avatar

I live in PA. So disappointed in Fetterman. I really have to think hard about what it is I say in my calls to him. I’d like to scream sometimes - but of course that would be totally counterproductive. I try to take the approach of expressing my views and encouraging him to do the right thing. I suspect he’s worried about all the MAGA votes in PA but idk.

Expand full comment
Beth Kephart's avatar

I live here too. And, you know, sometimes I scream. He won't get reelected, so I have no idea what he is doing.

Expand full comment
Barbara Moschner's avatar

I urged Tony Gonzales to vote NO for the CR. I left a voicemail for Cruz urging him to restore aid to Ukraine to avoid a national security crisis.

These senators, even Republicans, must be watching Trump double the tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum. They must be horrified even if they are remaining silent. Something needs to give and I wonder who it will be that will raise the alarm?

Expand full comment
Thomas's avatar

For a Democrat to vote Yes, there have to be some really solid guarantees that the money allocated goes to where it needs to.

Expand full comment
Tim Wegener's avatar

This was a very interesting conversation between Greg Sargent and Tom Malinowski, a former Congressman. I'm still struggling with what Dems should do if the House passes the CR, but this is another informed view.

https://newrepublic.com/article/192575/transcript-trump-sinking-heres-dems-shouldnt-save-him

Expand full comment
Janet Frohnmayer's avatar

Appreciated this article, Tim

Expand full comment
Tim Wegener's avatar

Now it appears that Trump and Vance are telling R's that they will ignore the CR and make their own illegal/unconstitutional cuts to the budget after the CR is approved.

https://www.politico.com/newsletters/inside-congress/2025/03/11/johnsons-spending-holdouts-00223195

There may not be a big win here for D's, but there are some big losses in this bill. Additionally, it's not a clean CR either.

https://bsky.app/profile/ringwiss.bsky.social/post/3lk4ckeetks23

I don't see how any D can vote for this.

Expand full comment
Thomas's avatar

Our Democratic senators will be Key. Georgia has two Democrats, who will be getting calls.

Expand full comment
Tim Wegener's avatar

Yep, exactly. This is a tough call, no doubt. But just letting this through is not an answer either.

Expand full comment
Simon Rosenberg's avatar

I wrote about how the CR was an opportunity for Dems to talk about the Trump Musk crime spree in my posts these last few days, and to further open up that Second Front.

Expand full comment
Tim Wegener's avatar

Exactly. This is a good opportunity for presenting the facts for all to see. I know I don't have that quite right. Such a messaging opportunity that could be undertaken by all our Congressional electeds and the DNC in concert together as one voice.

Expand full comment
wendy moluf's avatar

Great conversation. I hope our Democrats in Congress are listening to Malinowski.

Expand full comment
Ilene Bilenky's avatar

I call my R Rep. Hurd's office every day (and my two Dem. senators) as a registered Independent, Retired RN, MPH, US Army Reserves medical officer. So glad that former-rep Boebert carpetbagged to another district. Hurd is having a tele-town hall and while I will listen in, I told his office that he should be having a in-person, and not bending tooth orders of the former R party (he claims to be a "Reagan Republican," as I pointed out.He beat the good D candidate by only three points, largely because of anti-abortion in our huge rural district, after Boebert was going to get whipped, even here.

I tell all of them of my deep concern about the Musk takeover while trump golfs and betrays our allies and decimates federal agencies, especially the VA in our veteran-heavy district and hospital/services in Grand Junction. I tell them that my father didn't fight across Europe in 1944-5 to see this crap come here.

It's all I can do, besides subscribing to non-corporate news sources and sharing them.

Expand full comment
myrna solganick's avatar

I have said this before: we need a single leader to unify all the groups, including this one, who oppose Trump.

Expand full comment
Bryn Thenell's avatar

This! Especially to manage and amplify messaging on a daily basis. We need widespread, coordinated and consistent messaging nationwide.

Expand full comment
Deborah Potter's avatar

In the Hopium Community, we are the Leaders. "We are the ones we've been waiting for."

https://www.hopiumchronicles.com/p/we-are-the-ones-weve-been-waiting

Expand full comment
Simon Rosenberg's avatar

Friends, this is never going to happen. The only time a single person leads us is when we have a President. We are a team, millions of us, and we all have to do our part, every day.

In general it is very important during these challenging times to not set surrealistic expectations about what we can do and then end up perpetually disappointed.

Expand full comment
David Salzillo's avatar

And the Tea Party never really had a clear leader in the 2010s. And look how much power they were able to gain.

I think Tim Walz has made this point before, and it's a very useful insight.

Expand full comment
Pam W's avatar

What is being done to fund/support the Democratic candidates in the April FL-01 and FL-06 special elections?

Expand full comment
Linda (Evanston IL)'s avatar

I've been donating to all three: Judge Crawford, Gay Valimont, and Josh Weil. Josh Weil has a postcardstovoters.org mailing list with a concise message to write. This nonprofit organization also has a list for Judge Susan Crawford. I've been doing the postcards for both candidates daily.

Expand full comment
Thomas's avatar

I have become more familiar with FL-1 than FL-6. It's normally a 20+ point Red district. I've been reading the local paper: Pensacola News Journal (PNJ), and the letters to the editor have really turned against Trump. Lots of active military, retired vets, and retirees. People getting more "concerned" by the day.

The "spring break" economy is going to suffer by Canadians boycotting the US. I would love Bernie to hold a rally in Pensacola, and for college students to use their spring break to pitch in and preserve our democracy. That might happen...

David Hogg has been down there supporting Gay -- and Josh too.

Expand full comment
Pam W's avatar

My question is more what is the national party planning on doing? What is the Hopium community planning? I have seen David Hogg’s ads with Gay, but not much else. It seems as if there is more focus on the mid terms rather than trying to narrow the margins now. I also realize that these are traditionally red districts.

Expand full comment
Virginia Shultz-Charette's avatar

Simon has answered this numerous times. These are deep red districts, and he felt that it would be a waste of money. But if you want to support them, go ahead but we could not keep up with the millions of dollars the Republicans would be putting in. If you see polling that looks like a real turnaround, by all means let us know.

Expand full comment
Pam W's avatar

Wow, thanks for the “permission” to make a contribution on my own. Will pass on any info that comes my way.

Expand full comment
Beth Kephart's avatar

I swear, Simon, I can barely look at any of the news except through your eyes at the moment. I mean, I do. But I need you there, to keep turning this thing, to keep reminding us he's weak, to keep saying keep going. (I am, by the way. Even went to my first protest this Saturday, and that is saying something for a crowd-phobic artist/poet.) So, this is just a thank you. And now I'm going to go send a curse-filled email to McCormick. You should see the absolute SHIT of a "newsletter" he has now put out. Looks like the 1950s. Sounds like Hitler.

Expand full comment
Susan Dieterlen's avatar

Thank you for taking the big step of that first protest!! They do get easier (from an introverted writer)

Expand full comment
Beth Kephart's avatar

It was fun, actually. Helped to have friends near. A few sentences about the experience, from something larger I posted today, in case any other shy types are on the fence: Along the crest of a highway hill, inside the rounding gusts of wind, we lift our battered signs and rippling flags, our reverse-course declarations to the rumble of traffic, to the long horns of supplier trucks, to the short honks of sedans, to the cameras of strangers. Hundreds of us now, and more coming, hundreds of us and all that wind, and this weather is a crucible, but look at us: We’re here.

Expand full comment
Susan Dieterlen's avatar

This is beautiful, Beth. Thank you for sharing it! I hope others here see it. Not sure how long people keep reading the comments on past posts.

Expand full comment
Beth Kephart's avatar

Thank you, Susan. It was so interesting to break yet another barrier in my own life. Funny, what Trump Madness does to a soul.

Expand full comment
ArcticStones's avatar

WHEN FACTS GET ERASED…

ON HOPIUM, Simon continues his excellent data-driven analysis of our current predicament, encouraging factual discussion and well-targeted calls to action.

MEANWHILE: "How Trump is reshaping reality by hiding data"

"Curating reality is an old political game, but Trump’s sweeping statistical purges are part of a broader attempt to reinvent “truth”."

In short, the Trump regime continues to erase or bury data it doesn’t like. This article from the Washington Post highlights what has already happened. (Gift link) Expect far more of this. Don’t be surprised if we soon have no reliable unemployment figures, inflation scores or key government economic data.

https://wapo.st/4iCmMtn

Expand full comment
Jayne M's avatar

Not to mention the posting of blatantly stupid and mathematically impossible data like the comment that in just over one month illegal border crossings were down MORE THAN 100%!

Expand full comment
ArcticStones's avatar

Makes perfect sense – if you count the Americans fleeing Trumpistan.

/s

Expand full comment
Jayne M's avatar

😂 YES! Similar to a comment that said, "Does this mean folks are moving out of the country illegally?"

Expand full comment
Gt Ayc's avatar

Thank you Simon, I'm canvassing in district 6 for Josh wiel, one foot in front of the other, thank you community! We're in this together!

Expand full comment