122 Comments

As a lifelong renter, I approve Kamala's wonderful ad about expanding access to housing and homeownership. Have been preaching on this subject for literally years. Someone is finally listening!

Expand full comment

I 100% agree. I make a good living but home ownership is impossible in my market. Who can afford a $7,000/month mortgage?

Expand full comment

George Carlin had the solution to America’s homeless crisis. The solution is simple!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4w7H48tBS8

Expand full comment

😂

Expand full comment

George Carlin's one of our finest social/political stand-ups - he was hilarious and thankfully is still there for us on YouTube.

Expand full comment

Perfect!

Expand full comment

In lieu of a long prison sentence, I have been hoping that Donald would just disappear to Mar-a-Lago, go play with his tiny white balls and leave America alone.

Next best would be to have his properties seized to pay his many hundred-million-dollar fines. Perfect sites for lots of low-cost housing for our multi-ethnic homeless, including injured/damaged vets.

Expand full comment

Yes!

Expand full comment

Gosh, what a great thought to use for low income housing! It is so desperately needed for many!

Expand full comment

I’m frustrated at the insistence of pursuing the blue dot in Nebraska. There are Senate and House candidacies that will have much more of an impact on our lives and deserve our focus, money and support. The blue dot is an Election Night gotcha and is almost frat like in its childishness. It’s still Nebraska. $150,000 not going to GOTV efforts where it counts.

Expand full comment

Nobody is stopping you from focusing your money and support on any other candidacy-- up or down the ballot-- that you choose, Ann. The world in which Harris/Walz win MI, WI, and PA, but no other swing states, leaving them with 269 votes, is an incredibly-plausible one! In such a world, that blue dot decides the election. To some folks (and I am one of them), that contingency is worth devoting our time and money toward addressing. But I promise you that none of us will begrudge you for making a different choice with *your* time and money. This is a free country, after all.

Expand full comment

Just read this quote on a 1440 newsletter and thought it definitely fits Here and Now:

"Now is the accepted time, not tomorrow, not some more convenient season. It is today that our best work can be done." - W.E.B. Du Bois

Expand full comment

I believe that NE “blue dot” also represents an important House seat, and could help win a dark horse Senate seat (Independent Dan Osborn).

Expand full comment

Yup, Tony Vargas. So focusing on the Blue dot is a big contingency plan for the electoral college AND a needed House seat. Plus as you say, a dark horse Senate seat.

Expand full comment

I am not sure how it is a gotcha, it is an Electoral vote, and Tony Vargas is challenging Don Bacon in the same seat.

According to Simon the Hopium community is the largest outside investor in the states Democratic party. Also worth noting that the money probably also helps support the efforts in NE-01 which is a stretch but not out of the realm of possible for both Harris and the house candidate there. It seems like a low cost commitment with a high potential for return.

Expand full comment
author

Ann, you may not agree with this strategy but seriously what is up with your language and sentiment here? And you are also wrong. As I write in explanation for the "checkmate" strategy is that we are targeting the 3 states I felt most likely to get us to 270 beyond the 269 of the blue wall of MI, PA, WI - AZ, NC, NE-2 - all of which are also high return on investment states. When we began this campaign we were not leading in any of the Sun Belt states and it was a legit possibility that the ONLY WAY TO 270 was through NE-2. So as others have said it may not be for you but please both your analysis and sentiment are way off base.

Expand full comment

Also, for what it’s worth, Nebraska is a bit of a sleeper state. I live in Lincoln, which is the first district, and while it has been gerrymandered a bit, we’re not that far off from having two districts that could go blue in Nebraska. Might not happen this year, but we have a really good State chair helping to organize us in that direction. Because Nebraska doles out its electors via congressional district, that means we could very soon earn two electoral college votes out of Nebraska, as well as two members of the United States House of Representatives. What’s even more important is that, if we can drive the totals high enough in the Omaha and Lincoln area over time, we could possibly be able to win a statewide election again here in the coming years. If we did that in a presidential year, we would get four of Nebraska’s five electoral votes… And even more important than that, we would be functionally a competitive state for the governorship and the senate seats… A big problem in a place like Nebraska is that people don’t believe that it can flip, but if we get over that hurdle one district at a time,when Democrats in the state no longer think their vote is wasted, this becomes a swing state that was on nobody’s radar.

Expand full comment

Writing Vote Forward letters for NE-02, with support from colleagues that have lived in Nebraska helping to draft personal message, specifically for NE-02. Also doing a Blue Wave postcard campaign for Nebraska where electoral votes are important.

Expand full comment

We are not doing everything here: we are focused on certain objectives, especially Winning the House so President Harris can implement the Democratic agenda. Winning MI/PA/WI gets us to 269 and adding NE-2 gets us to 270 Electoral College votes and winning the election. Winning AZ, NC, NE-2 also wins the Presidency. Trump needs to win both Rust Belt & Sun Belt states to get to 270. It's math.

Expand full comment

I read somewhere that when Barack Obama ran in 2008 his strategists made the Blue Dot a priority, so to me it makes sense to continue that successful winning strategy.

Expand full comment

Disagree Ann. The blue dot is “extremely” important and could very well decide the EC. Other seats are very important but Trump is an insane person and dangerous for our country and world and must be defeated.

Expand full comment
Aug 27·edited Aug 27

I can't wait for the subscriber discussion tonight. I love that Harris is going on offense is is not taking the bait either from Trump or the media. She's talking directly to the voters we need to win and not letting anyone filter her message. Trump is melting down and hoping election shenanigans will up-end the race for him if the vote is close, so our job is to make it not close. Let's get to work.

Expand full comment

I totally agree. Instead of using words of fear, panic or anxiety, she dismisses Trump with non-emotional words like "unserious" and then pivots to her message. She's driving this train. She's not reacting to his insanity. It feels like we're in charge for the first time in 8 years.

Expand full comment
Aug 28·edited Aug 28

She is a trained Prosecutor! It's how she earned a living. She is a professional, and that is what we need for an adversary that terrifies him and brings out even more inner weirdness. I feel like I should not be enjoying watching him squirm quite so much. :-}

Expand full comment

Oh, do enjoy his diminishment at the hands of our next President!!!!!! I find that laughing at him helps me heal from all the daily trauma of having to hear his voice or read his rantings.

Expand full comment

It feels like the only way to respond given his propensity for diminishing everyone around him. It is the only way he can feel superior. What a story (good horror movie).

Expand full comment

The Harris-Walz campaign seems to recognize they have two opposition fronts, both equally dedicated to defeating her: the media and the Trump campaign. Fortunately CNN , NYT and the GOP are all so apoplectic at the prospect of a woman of color ascending to the presidency that they are getting sloppy in their frenzied attempts to damage her. Case in point: CNN's "undecided voters" panel. Pretending there is any semblance of neutrality in the corporate media is a mistake we can't afford to make. But it's equally a mistake to attribute a plan to Trump. Trying to overturn an election was only even a possibility when he held the White House. And he didn't even come close.

Expand full comment

That’s a very good point, Brian!! Relieving to consider as well!! Grateful you shared your perspective.

You are absolutely correct, tRump will NOT be operating from the WH, levers of power clutched in his tiny, orange hands, minions scurrying to accomplish his insane bidding.

Oh, he will rant, rave and hopefully 😤blow a gasket. But all the vituperation in his tantrums on Election Night 2024 will be sound and fury; signifying

N😡THING! 🌊☮️🧜‍♀️

Expand full comment

What an incredible candidate! Joe Biden is great as well, but I'm not unhappy with where we are.

Expand full comment

1. Please ask Riley to partner with FT 6. FT 6 is sending the following to NY state wide:

Hello [Their Name]! A strong economy should benefit all. But MAGA Republicans want to give money to the rich and end Social Security & Medicare. FIGHT THIS! Register and vote for Democrats who will protect Social Security benefits, raise taxes on billionaires & lower prescription drug prices! ft6.us/NY_reg

https://www.fieldteam6.org/

2. The economy -- Yesterday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at a new high of 41,240.52.

3. Debate -- must have olfactometers displayed on the screen.

Expand full comment

Olfactometer?? Did I read that right? A jab at the diaper-wearing candidate?

Expand full comment

Or else that Trump statements don't "pass the sniff test" (aka 💩 meter).

Expand full comment

How will low information voters, Republican or otherwise, ever find out about these important endorsements? I have a relative who firmly believes Elon Musk believes in free speech. I hope social media users are sharing information and values to persuade potential voters what's at stake.

Expand full comment

We are the messengers.

Expand full comment

I personally plan to reach out to all the people I know in swing states through calls, and all the young people in my life. Every mind we change matters, if we're all doing this, we'll have a huge impact.

Expand full comment

I do send or discuss F2F key talking points, economic facts, as well as one or two of the ever upbeat and enthusiastic Simon’s excellent graphs to a small circle of folk.

It has evolved organically that I advise informally well intentioned yet frustrated folk who are at a loss for WTF to say to the tRumper next door or across the table. Even though I am a retired public school administrator who can talk a kitty off a tuna boat,

(and textbank like a teenager🤭) learning new useful kernels is always welcome and valuable, IMO!

I find strategies, training opportunities and information from Indivisibles, invaluable! If anyone is not aware of them, they are terrific group, operating in communities nationwide. Ezra Levin is one of the founders. Indivisible can be found at: https://indivisible.org

Members have been energized to ignite successful grassroots efforts: such as ignored senior citizens finally embarrassing a repub congressman in Indiana enough so he was forced to meet with them, force cowardly reps in AZ, OH, NM not to ignore constituents but to see & hear their concerns, hold town meetings where none had ever been and won proven change since 2016. 🇺🇸☮️YES, WE KAM!!🗽🇺🇸

Expand full comment

QUESTION: COAT TAILS or TICKET SPLITTING?

In most swing states, we see Democratic senate candidates polling very well, with comfortable leads, while the Harris–Trump polls show closer races. And yet, in our hyperpartisan era, there is relatively little ticket-splitting. Which raises the topic of which candidate(s) will influence whom...

Simon, my three related questions:

– Do you expect Democratic senate candidates to underperform?

– Do you think Kamala Harris is likely to overperform her polls (reverse coat tails)?

– Or are we likely to see as much ticket-splitting as indicated by the current divergent polls?

We do the work, but any thoughts about these voting dynamics would be most appreciated!

Expand full comment
founding

I know I'm not Simon, but some thoughts from an article on this in May:

"In 1976, according to ANES, more than one-quarter of voters split their ticket between president and Congress. The numbers were similar in 1988, another year without a significant third-party candidate confusing voting statistics.

In 1988, because of a quirk in Texas election laws originally crafted for Lyndon Johnson, Democratic Sen. Lloyd Bentsen simultaneously ran for reelection and vice president on a doomed ticket with Michael Dukakis. The power of ticket-splitting was demonstrated when Sen. Bentsen ran nearly 800,000 votes ahead of Vice President Bentsen.

The difference between presidential and congressional voting patterns in those days can be partially explained by how slowly Southern states made the transition to the Republican Party. As a result, moderate House Democrats like John Spratt in South Carolina held on to their seats until the 2010s.

By 2012, the last normal presidential election without Trump on the ballot, 89 percent of the electorate voted a straight ticket for president and Congress. As both parties became more ideologically uniform, there was less temptation for voters to pick one candidate from Column A and another from Column B. "

https://rollcall.com/2024/05/14/will-the-last-ticket-splitting-voter-please-turn-out-the-light/

Expand full comment
founding

In other words, I think that the senate and presidential numbers will converge by the time we get to November.

Expand full comment

That’s my thinking as well. The key question is, converge at which level – closer to the Senate candidates’ poll numbers or to Kamala Harris’ poll numbers?

(As I understand it, Harris is still rising, the polls are still catching up. I’m optimistically waiting for her convention bounce!)

Expand full comment
founding

I think her numbers will trend up, but I also think it will be the final numbers being higher than her polling.

1.Trump underperformed significantly in the primaries this year when they were still competitive. He underperformed by 3% to 30% depending on the state. I have yet to see an explanation as to how/why polls now are more accurate.

2. The senate/gov (in NC) candidates are generally MAGA or MAGA+ candidates, which is why they are behind. At the end of the day, if you don't want MAGA, you don't want MAGA. I think Kari Lake and Robinson in NC will likely make those states blue this year, hence I think her numbers go up to match the other candidates. Plus, you have abortion amendments in NV and other places that also may help drive her numbers up.

I think this could be a lot like 1980 where the polling is close but the end result moves a lot in the last week.

Expand full comment
Aug 27·edited Aug 28

WRT Mark Robinson, a very interesting post from a substack on NC Politics that I follow:

https://www.politicsnc.com/p/will-the-gop-pull-the-plug-on-robinson?r=1aiy5t&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment
founding

Thanks for sharing. That’s exactly what I am thinking.

Expand full comment

I thought with some special elections (i.e., OH, perhaps), Democratic new registration of women was quite high. I believe this will be one for the history books.

Expand full comment
founding

It certainly can be! If we keep doing the work from now until election day, I think you are correct.

Expand full comment

Anderson Clayton was amazing on Rachael Maddow last night night . She’s extremely informative, energetic … an outstanding communicator for North Carolina. Thank you for introducing Hopium Community to Anderson early on. Her leadership is inspiring!

Expand full comment

HS Students: Earn a $150 gift card for running a voter registration drive with the Civics Center:

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2024/8/27/2265361/-Are-you-a-HS-student-teacher-parent-or-admin-or-know-one-A-great-way-to-register-new-voters

Expand full comment
Aug 27Liked by Simon Rosenberg

On Josh Riley... I attended Swing Blue Alliance's Frontline Update and Josh attended from his car with his wife and children on his way to canvas. I was moved enough to book an Air BNB (it's a 3 hour drive for us) for my husband and me.

I also contacted a friend who has get to take action and she and her husband are going to give it a day. One of the morals of this story is that if you have been asking others to get involved - ask again. Many are ready now.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you! He is a great candidate.

Expand full comment

💙 both ads. I see Team Harris managed to get in Trump’s small, accordion hands.😏

DeSantis was on the Space Coast last week bragging about all the companies coming to FL.

DeSantis is why the rent (and mortgage) is too damn high !

⬇️

Florida homes owned by corporate investors: 117,000 — and counting

Many Florida neighborhood are grappling with a broader trend disrupting the real estate industry, once controlled almost entirely by homeowners and mom-and-pop landlords. Corporate real estate investors own more than 117,000 single-family homes across Florida, according to a first-of-its-kind analysis of the state by the Tampa Bay Times. Experts say these investors capitalized on the state’s population growth and minimal renter protections. [Source: Tampa Bay Times]

https://www.floridatrend.com/article/40924/florida-homes-owned-by-corporate-investors-117000-and-counting

Expand full comment

It's my not very popular belief that along with the right to health care, every person in America has the right to be homed, ie, live in a home. Accordingly, I think that residential real estate should be off-limits for investment. I realize it'll never happen, but anything that can be done by the federal government to further 'homing' people is something I support.

Expand full comment

Very interesting.

Expand full comment

Simon… a request. Can you also post on Threads. Lots of Twitter refugees there!

Expand full comment
author

I post daily there but only once a day.

Expand full comment

Awesome! Found you and followed. I've never been on Twitter/X, but downloaded Threads for the Olympics and am still enjoying it a lot.

Expand full comment

This is happening now in NC -

A friend has shared this WRAL News article with you.

https://wr.al/1Sc78

After hearing of vote roll purging in Texas and other states, it's now an issue in NC and happening pretty late in the election cycle. And considering that Trump only beat Biden by ~75,000 votes in 2020, it could be meaningful.

I am canvassing in the area outside of Raleigh and both our scripts and the literature we hand out remind the people we meet to register and to check that their voter registration is active.

Expand full comment

Thanks for your post. A dear friend, following encouragement to have voters check their registration here in NC, found that 3 of her contacts had been purged. One had even voted in the spring primary.

Expand full comment
Aug 27·edited Aug 27

It's also important to note that purged voters can still cast provisional ballots. So on election day and during early voting we need to get everyone to the polls and make sure they bring an ID whether we got them to re-register or not. We can even call those people up and make sure they confirm their ballot has been "cured" after the election. I did it for the Georgia runoff. I think we need to do a better job communicating what these purges actually mean. Too often, our message sounds like, "They purged the voter rolls, so let's all go stick our heads in an oven." It discourages people and might even depress our turnout if people think the election is lost months in advance. Positive messages motivate people. Trying to convince people we live in Venezuela just makes them want to stay home. We have many more volunteers than they have. We have the resources to jump this hurdle.

Expand full comment

FOX News refused to air a single minute of Adam Kinzinger or the other Republicans who took the stage at the DNC to endorse Kamala Harris for president.

SUGGESTION: The Harris-Walz Campaign can puncture the reality-denying Fox news bubble by cutting an ad that highlights the message of these brave, patriotic Republicans who are putting "country above party". That ad would invite Fox viewers to follow their good example!

Expand full comment

Great ad by Monica Tranel running for the MT-01 seat. It is a little bit of a stretch but if Tester is going to win Montana Tranel will probably have to win her seat.

https://nitter.poast.org/MonicaTranel/status/1828426369535242259#m

Expand full comment
author

For reasons we don't yet understand folks who work on Apple products, particularly iPads, are having a hard time signing up for our event tonight. I want to encourage everyone to try alternative means of signing up - different devices, different browsers, a friend. It is not practical for me to be able to manually sign up folks every time we have an event. I will call Zoom today and see what they say but I need folks to be industrious here. The link works. Many have signed up. There are a handful of people who it doesn't work for and I will do everything I can to fix that in the coming days. S

Expand full comment

I find that signing up works better on my cell phone and then I can watch it on my iPad!

Expand full comment

I sign up on my iPhone also. Watch on iPad. Seems to work

Expand full comment
Aug 27Liked by Simon Rosenberg

For what it’s worth, signup via Firefox on my Apple MacBook works fine.

Expand full comment
author

Yes folks need to try alternative browsers.....

Expand full comment

I used Chrome and it worked fine on my laptop.

Expand full comment

The problem with zoom registration seems to be limited to Apple and mostly to iPads.

Expand full comment

I am able to sign in on my cell phone but not on my ipad, hopefully someone can fix this as I prefer my tablet.

Thanks Simon

Expand full comment
author

once you sign up you can log in and watch from any device....

Expand full comment

Not sure what's happening there ... I am on Apple and was able to sign up with no problem. Sorry other folks are having issues (used my laptop by the way).

Expand full comment

The NYT had an article “21 questions for Kamala Harris.” I have a few questions for trump. Do you?

Why should a convicted fraudster be President?

Why should a sexual predator, as determined by a court of law, be President?

How can a serial liar be trusted to be President?

What is your idea of a “black job”?

As a child, did your mother encourage you to call people ugly names and pronounce their real names incorrectly?

Why does coloring your face and hair orange make you feel better about yourself?

Do you know that being proud of your results of a dementia test, and acting as though it is an intelligence test, is foolish?

Why do you not accept the judgements from the jury of your peers?

Why do you not accept the will of the people when they vote?

Why do you refuse to deliver a peaceful transition of power?

Why do you think it is a good idea to “Hang Mike Pence?”

Why did you serve fast food to the Clemson Tigers at the White House when they won the 2018 college football national championship game?

Why does it look like a mushroom?

Why do you slur your words?

Do you have a train of thought?

Have you considered a hair transplant instead of a combover?

Why shouldn’t you ask God for forgiveness?

What national security secrets did you tell to the dictators of the world?

What happened to the rest of the classified documents?

Did your daddy love you?

If convicted of treason for the Jan. 6 insurrection, and you are subsequently sentenced for a capital offense, do you prefer death via eaten by shark or electrocution?

Expand full comment

Honestly the NYT is headlining itself into irrelevance. I don’t click on any remotely biased headline or one that ends with a ?. Just scroll right past. What MSM has the Felon done outside of Fox News? Why isn’t there ever a follow up question asking the Felon to define a fair election? Could an election he loses be, by definition, fair? What is communism?

The MSM is failing and complicit. Ignore what you can!!

Expand full comment

First I cancelled my NYT subscription. Then they offered me my previous academic rate of $4 for 6 months. I find some value in Wordle and Spelling Bee and encouraging me to come up with 21 questions for trump. 😂

P.S. I don't have cable TV or streaming. PBS NewsHour is what I watch every day. I have no idea what people mean by MSM, but suspect it is subjective.

Expand full comment

I have come to believe that the MSM sees the writing on the wall. They are going the way of the telegraph or My Space. As a reaction, they resort to attention grabbing headlines that invoke anxiety, fear and anger. They are hastening their irrelevance IMHO.

Expand full comment
founding

Just wait until Harris-Walz crushes it in this election and the GOP totally fractures and MAGA descends into the "dustbin of history"--to quote Simon. The NYT and mainstream media will absolutely commodify our new movement just like the MSM and "powers that be" did of the changes in culture in the late 60s and early 70s. Of course they follow the prevailing winds. There's no heart or soul in any of these institutions, just a board and a CEO trying to maximize income--and trying to straddle a fence when an election or subscribers are nearly evenly divided.

Expand full comment

This won't end after Kamala wins. They will use all the resources at their disposal to try and drive her approval rating as low as they can get it. And those resources come from the Democrats who subscribe to their paper. So why are we financing our own opposition? Don't give them another penny. Not now, not after the election, not ever.

Expand full comment

Im with you Brian. As much as they'd been getting on my nerves, they lost my subscription with their reporting on the Robert Hur conclusions. I could blatantly see how strongly they were manufacturing a narrative for the purposes of yellow journalism. And honestly, for all the bitching about Kamala's policy details or any resentment of her not doing an interview - I don't think she should take the bait. Her job as a candidate is not to make the times, the post or any other outlet "happy" - fuck that. Her job is convince enough people she has their back! Eat your hearts out NYT - I'll give relevance a goodbye kiss for you.

Expand full comment