Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Simon Rosenberg's avatar

Not sure folks posted about this yet - WI SCOTUS strikes down 176 year old abortion ban

https://apnews.com/article/wisconsin-abortion-ban-1849-01658358639a63db7df92aeec34c612d

This community raised a lot of money and did a great deal of work to elect the last two WI Supreme Court Justices. Congrats everyone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Expand full comment
Art B.'s avatar

Senator Murkowski's selling out to party over country is reprehensible. Bribery is nothing short of disguising spineless cowardice by bending a knee to her GOP colleagues. There are profound consequences of a politician accepting obsequiousness. Let me explain.

The act of casting a vote is, in its purest form, a sacred civic duty, a cornerstone of democratic governance. It is meant to be a deliberate, conscience-driven decision, made with the collective good of the nation at its heart. To accept a bribe in exchange for prioritizing party over country, however, is to fundamentally corrupt this process, embedding consequences that ripple far beyond the immediate transaction, ultimately eroding the very foundations of a just and functional society.

Firstly, such an act shatters the public's trust in the electoral system and, by extension, in government itself. When votes are perceived as commodities to be bought and sold, the legitimacy of elected officials diminishes. Citizens become cynical, believing that their voices are irrelevant compared to the influence of money. This cynicism can lead to widespread apathy, discouraging participation in future elections and weakening the democratic spirit. A populace that believes its leaders are beholden to private interests rather than public service is a populace disengaged and disillusioned, ripe for instability.

Secondly, prioritizing party over country, especially under duress of a bribe, inevitably leads to policies that serve narrow, partisan agendas rather than the broader national interest. Decisions on critical issues—be it economic policy, healthcare, education, or foreign relations—become skewed, designed to benefit a specific faction or donor rather than the entire citizenry. This can result in short-sighted, inefficient, or even harmful legislation. For instance, a bribe might lead to the approval of a project that is environmentally damaging but profitable for a specific company, or the rejection of a much-needed social program because it doesn't align with a party's strict ideology, regardless of its benefit to the people. The long-term health and prosperity of the nation are sacrificed for immediate, illicit gain.

Furthermore, the acceptance of bribes fosters a culture of corruption that permeates all levels of governance. If one vote can be bought, why not others? This creates a dangerous precedent, incentivizing more illicit transactions and making it increasingly difficult for ethical individuals to operate within the system. It normalizes unethical behavior, making it harder to distinguish between legitimate political contributions and outright bribery. This insidious spread of corruption diverts resources, stifles innovation, and ultimately undermines the rule of law, as those who uphold it may themselves become compromised.

In conclusion, accepting a bribe to vote party first and country second is not merely a personal moral failing; it is an act of profound civic betrayal. It corrodes public trust, distorts policy-making, and cultivates a pervasive culture of corruption. The embedded consequences are a weakened democracy, a disillusioned populace, and a nation whose future is mortgaged for the fleeting gain of a few. The true cost of such a vote is the slow, steady unraveling of the social contract and the collective aspiration for a just and prosperous society.

Expand full comment
174 more comments...

No posts