Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Carolyn from IL's avatar

Kudos to the House Democrats who voted AGAINST additional funding for ICE in the DHS appropriations bill because it contained no meaningful restrictions or accountability measures to rein in ICE and Border Patrol.

Very disappointed in the 7 Democrats who voted FOR this bill.

A Senate vote on the DHS funding bill is expected next week. The Senate bill needs 60 votes to pass, which means Democrats have real leverage here. But Chuck Schumer is not publicly whipping Senate Democrats to unify in opposition. That means it's up to us to pressure our Senators!!

In my opinion, we can't wait until AFTER the DHS appropriations bill is passed. What leverage will Democrats have then? The power of the purse is the only leverage I see. We need Senate Democrats to act NOW to rein in violence by ICE agents.

Tom Thumb's avatar

I am here this AM to TESTIFY to the Way Of Simon. Intellectually, this calling Congress strategy always made sense to me, but when you see it actually work...well, it's different, isn't it?

Earlier this week, my Congresswoman, Rosa DeLauro, chief negotiator for the Dems in the House, publicly said she was going to vote for the DHS budget. I called her, got someone on the phone, spoke to them from the perspective of someone whose family lived under the Nazis and who, himself, lived under an authoritarian regime for four years, told her I find ICE increasingly indistinguishable from the Brownshirts and the SS, how & why they're an existential threat to democracy (can't you just see them pulling Black and brown people out of line [thanks, Judge Kavanaugh] while they're waiting to vote?), how toothless the reforms are, "business as usual, nothing but horsetrading at the margins" "NOTHING Trump has done has surprised me. Nothing. What has is the complete lack of resistance on the part of people with a lot more power to stop them than I do." Etc. She agreed with everything I said.

I'm sure I'm not the only one who called, probably not even the only Hopium who did, but whatever: yesterday she voted AGAINST it!!! Maybe this was just because she saw Johnson had his act together for once, but why be cynical? We take the wins where we can get them, right Simon? On to the Senate (two sets: CT & WI, no mortgage fraud), then a thank you call to Rosa DL :)

88 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?